Do you need Records Management? Three clear signs — and the next steps to take.
- Thelesspaper.com Editor

- Dec 28, 2025
- 3 min read

Most organisations don’t think about records management proactively.
It’s rarely driven by strategy or enthusiasm for governance. Instead, it tends to surface gradually, through small operational frustrations and unanswered questions about documents, retention, and responsibility.
Is there actually a risk?
At first glance, it may not feel like it. Documents exist, work gets done, and nothing appears broken. But risk in records management is rarely immediate or visible. It accumulates quietly — through uncertainty about what should be kept, inconsistency in how records are handled, and reliance on informal knowledge rather than clear rules. By the time the risk becomes obvious, the opportunity to address it calmly has usually passed.
Records management exists to deal with this exact situation — not by adding complexity, but by restoring control before problems become incidents.
How You Know Records Management Is Needed
You may already need records management if any of the following sound familiar:
Different teams store the same documents in different places
Important records live in inboxes or personal folders
No one agrees how long documents should be kept
Everything is retained “just in case”
Preparing for audits or reviews is manual and disruptive
Individually, these issues feel manageable. Together, they indicate a lack of structure around records and a growing dependence on habit rather than policy.
At that point, the organisation is no longer fully in control of its information.
What Records Management Actually Does
Records Management is often misunderstood as a compliance exercise or a bureaucratic layer. In practice, it is a business discipline that ensures records are handled consistently and responsibly throughout their lifecycle.
When done properly, records management:
Defines which documents are official records
Applies clear rules for access and retention
Protects sensitive and regulated information
Supports audits and regulatory reviews
Prevents unnecessary data growth
Most importantly, it replaces informal, person-dependent practices with clear, defensible rules.
The Three Next Things to Do
Recognising the need for records management is only the starting point. What matters is taking the right first steps.
1. Agree on What Counts as a Record
Not every document is a record. Drafts, working files, and duplicates do not carry the same obligation as final, authoritative documents.
Start by agreeing:
Which documents have legal, financial, or regulatory value
Which documents support key business decisions
Which documents are temporary or transitory
This definition should be simple and easy to explain. If staff don’t understand it, they won’t apply it consistently.
Clarity here removes uncertainty everywhere else.
2. Put Clear Retention Rules in Place
Retention is the foundation of records management.
For each record type, the organisation needs to know:
How long it must be kept
Why that period exists
What should happen when it expires
Without clear retention rules, the default behaviour is to keep everything. While this feels cautious, it increases legal exposure, storage costs, and audit complexity.
Deleting records at the right time is not a risk — it is a controlled, accountable action.
3. Make Records Management Part of Everyday Work
Records management rarely fails because the policy is wrong. It fails because it relies on people remembering to apply it.
It works best when:
Records are captured as part of normal processes
Classification happens early, not at the end
Access and retention rules are applied automatically
This is where document management systems and process automation support records management by embedding control into everyday work.
Why This Matters
Organisations are creating more information than ever before. Without structure, that information becomes harder to trust, harder to manage, and harder to defend.
With records management in place:
Audits become routine rather than disruptive
Staff know what is expected of them
Risk is reduced rather than deferred
The organisation can demonstrate control
That confidence matters.
A Final Thought
Most organisations don’t have a records problem. They have a decision problem — decisions that were never made about what should be kept, for how long, and why.
Records management is simply the act of making those decisions and applying them consistently.
If your organisation can’t confidently explain how it manages its records, then records management isn’t something to consider later.
It’s something you already need.




Comments